Developments around the Futenma issue
Ryukyu Shimpo: A group of Okinawa prefectural assembly, led by Yonekichi Shinzato(SDP) went to Tokyo to submit a position statement to Defense Minister Kitazawa, opposing the inter-prefectural relocation of Futenma Air Station and calling for a quick and smooth return of Futenma.
http://ryukyushimpo.jp/news/storyid-159072-storytopic-3.html (Japanese)
Okinawa Times: Now Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirano is considering another plan to build a 1,800m runway off the coast of Katsuren, Uruma City of Okinawa, reclaiming 200 hectares between Ukibaru Island and Miyagi Island. The news below is in Japanese, but has a map to show where it is. http://www.okinawatimes.co.jp/article/2010-03-11_4342/
Government will consider this plan on top of the PNP and SDP submitted plans. (See previous posts:
http://peacephilosophy.blogspot.com/2010/03/current-situation-of-okinawa.html
http://peacephilosophy.blogspot.com/2010/03/pnps-proposals-for-okinawa.html
The OT reporter suspects this plan is realistic, as the reclaimed area will be even larger than 160 hectares for Henoko, and opposition from local communities, including the fishing industry is inevitable. Toshio Shimabukuro, mayor of Uruma is opposing the plan and reclaiming the public water body will require an approval from Governor Nakaima, who has been expressing opposition to the government proposals.
Japan Times:
Nakaima to Hirano: Schwab, White Beach both bad options
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20100311a5.html (English)
My question now would be why the government comes up with so many "ken-nai isetsu"(inter-prefectural relocation) plans including unrealistic ones like this. Are they just trying to brainwash people's minds into thinking that inter-prefectural relocation is now inevitable and they settle for the practical question of which is the "better" plan as Hirano suggested to Nakaima a few weeks ago? Given the prefectural assembly's unanimous resolution and Nakaima's support of it, I can't imagine the government is stupid enough to proceed any of these plans to build a new base within Okinawa.
What is their real scheme?
Let me end by introducing an excellent YouTube slide show to illustrate the Futenma relocation issue. The translation and supplementary information are provided by Makiko Sato at this link:
http://www.anatakara.com/petition/peace-to-okinawa-peace-to-guam.html
PeacePhilosopher
Peace Philosophy Centre, based in Vancouver, Canada (est. 2007), provides a space for dialogue and facilitates learning for creating a peaceful and sustainable world. ピース・フィロソフィー・センター(カナダ・バンクーバー 2007年設立)は平和で持続可能な世界を創るための対話と学びの場を提供します。피스필로소피센터(캐나다·밴쿠버 2007년 설립)는 평화롭고 지속 가능한 세계를 만들기 위한 대화와 배움의 장소를 제공합니다. 欢迎来到和平哲学中心!我们来自加拿大温哥华,我们致力于促进对话及建立可持续发展的和平世界。欢迎您留下宝贵的评论。Follow Twitter: @PeacePhilosophy / "Like" Facebook: Peace Philosophy Centre メールEmail: peacephilosophycentre@gmail.com
To view articles in English only, click HERE. 日本語投稿のみを表示するにはここをクリック。点击此处观看中文稿件。한국어 투고 ★Follow Twitter ツイッターは@PeacePhilosophy and Facebook ★投稿内に断り書きがない限り、当サイトの記事の転載は許可が必要です。peacephilosophycentre@gmail.com にメールをください。Re-posting from this blog requires permission unless otherwise specified. Please email peacephilosophycentre@gmail.com to contact us.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment