To view articles in English only, click HERE. 日本語投稿のみを表示するにはここをクリック。点击此处观看中文稿件한국어 투고 Follow Twitter ツイッターは@PeacePhilosophy and Facebook ★投稿内に断り書きがない限り、当サイトの記事の転載は許可が必要です。peacephilosophycentre@gmail.com にメールをください。Re-posting from this blog requires permission unless otherwise specified. Please email peacephilosophycentre@gmail.com to contact us.

Monday, March 07, 2011

Anger Spreads Over Kevin Maher's Derogatory Comments on Okinawans ケビン・メア 沖縄蔑視発言に怒り拡がる(英文原文)

Kevin Maher
報道されているケビン・メア氏の発言の英語原文(学生のノートをもとにしたもの)です。(赤字の部分は、メア氏が事実誤認しているところを訂正しているもので、このブログのオーナーが追加したものです。)日本語での報道は、共同のものを一番下に貼り付けました。琉球新報沖縄タイムスなどにも特集記事がたくさんあるので見てください。英語原文のPDF版はこちらです

On December 3, 2010, Kevin Maher, Director of the Office of Japan Affairs and former U.S. Consul-General of Okinawa gave a lecture to the fourteen students of American University (Washington, DC) who were going to visit Okinawa to learn about the issues surrounding US military bases there. Kyodo News Agency, Okinawan newspapers Ryukyu Shimpo and Okinawa Taimusu, and other media reported it on March 7, 2011, and anger quickly spread through Okinawa over Maher's numerous derogatory remarks about Okinawa and its people. The March 8 edition of Ryukyu Shimpo ran almost five full pages of special reports, analyses, an editorial that calls for dismissal of Maher, a response from US Embassy in Tokyo saying Maher's views did not represent the US government at all, and critical comments from former Governor of Okinawa Ota Masahide, citizens, politicians and scholars in Okinawa and Japan. Ota says Maher is one who "endorsed the Henoko plan, so we should use this opportunity to crush the plan."

Here is the original text of Maher's lecture, based on the notes that the AU students took then.

Note: PeacePhilosopher added corrections to factual errors in the lecture in red, italic and bolded letters.  See the PDF version without annotation HERE.


United States Department of States Briefing

December 3rd, 4pm, at the Department of State

Participants

-Department of State:
Mr. Kevin K. Maher, Director of the Office of Japan Affairs


-American University:
14 Members of Alternative Break Trip to Okinawa, Japan, Winter Break 2010, "U.S. Military Bases and Their Impacts in Okinawa, Japan"


Presentation

***All opinions and claims are from Mr. Maher

  • I was the Consul General in Okinawa until 2009. It is said that a half of U.S. bases in Japan is located in Okinawa, but the statistic only includes bases used exclusively by the US Military. If all bases, US bases and bases jointly used by the US and JSDF, are considered, the percent of bases in Okinawa is much lower.  (75% of military bases in Japan  exclusive to US use are in Okinawa.)
  • The controversial bases in Okinawa were originally in the middle of rice fields, but are now in the middle of towns because Okinawans allowed urbanization and population growth to surround United States facilities. (US military acquired many of those lands by forceful expropriation or while local residents were in the concentration camps during and after the war. Many residents had no place to live when they returned from the camp, and lived around the bases, close to their home land and where their anscestors' tombs were)
  • The US bases in Okinawa exist for regional security. The Japanese obligation under the US-Japan security treaty is to provide land for bases. The relationship between Japan and the US under the security treaty is asymmetric and benefits the Japanese to the detriment of the US.  (This is contradictory to Maher's last statement, "The high host nation support the Japanese government currently pays is beneficial to the US.We’ve got a very good deal in Japan.")  Japan is not obligated to defend the United States if US forces are attacked, but the United States must defend and protect Japan’s people and property.
  • Collective security is not a constitutional issue, but a policy issue. (Yes, it is a constitutional issue. The Japanese government's interpretation of Article 9 holds that Japan is NOT allowed to use its right of collective self-defense.)

  • Eighteen thousand (18,000) US Marines and an air wing are stationed in Okinawa. (The number in 2007 was 13,200 according to Okinawa Prefecture. The number of Marines in Okinawa at any given time is a lot lower, with many of them in Iraq/Afghanistan and training elsewhere in Asia.) The United States needs bases in Okinawa for two reasons: bases are already there and Okinawa is an important geographical location. 
  • (While showing a map of East Asia) US Forces Japan is headquartered in Tokyo and is the location of a logistics hub that would coordinate supplies and troops in the event of a crisis. Misawa, an important base in the Cold War, is the closest U.S. base to Russia and the base at Iwakuni is only 30 min from Korea, yet Okinawa’s geographic location is important to regional security.
  • Okinawa was an independent Kingdom paying tribute to China, although it has never been a part of China. The U.S. occupied Okinawa until 1972.
  • The Okinawan people’s anger and frustration is directed at Japan rather than the United States.The DPJ government does not understand Okinawa.  The Japanese government does not have a “pipe” of communication to Okinawa. When I offer to contact people in Okinawa DPJ officials say “Yes! Yes, please!” The LDP communicated with Okinawa and understood Okinawan concerns better than the current DPJ government.
  • One third of people believe the world would be more peaceful without a military. It is impossible to talk with such people.
  • The 2009 election brought the DPJ to power, which was the first change in the government of Japan.Hatoyama was a leftist politician. Despite the DPJ and PM Hatoyama, the US and Japan managed to issue the 2+2 statement in May.
(Mr. Maher left the room and two his colleagues gave a lecture about the US-Japan economic relationship. Mr. Maher returned to resume his lecture and the two officials left the room.)

  • The US will relocate 8000 Marines from Futenma to Guam in order to reduce the US Military footprint on Okinawa. The plan will allow the US to maintain a military presence in the region to provide regional security and deterrence capability.
  • Under the Roadmap, Japan will provide money for the relocation and it is a sign of a tangible effort from Japan. The DPJ government has delayed implementation, but I am confident that government will implement the existing plan. Tokyo needs to tell the Okinawan Governor, “if you want money, sign it [agree to the relocation plan].” ]

  • There is nowhere else to base US Marines. The DPJ suggested a replacement facility in mainland Japan, but there is no place in mainland Japan for the US Military.
  • Japanese culture is a culture of "Wa" (harmony) that is based on consensus. Consensus building is important in Japanese culture. While the Japanese would call this “consensus,” they mean “extortion” and use this culture of consensus as a means of “extortion.” By pretending to seek consensus, people try to get as much money as possible. Okinawans are masters of “manipulation” and “extortion” of Tokyo.
  • Okinawa's main industry is tourism. While there is an agricultural industry, the main industry is tourism. Although Okinawans grow goya, other prefectures grow more than Okinawa. Okinawans are too lazy to grow goya (Okinawa is the number one producer of goya, or bitter melon, in Japan, with a share of 33%, followed by Miyazaki's 17% and Kagoshima's 14%).
  • Okinawa has the highest divorce rate, birthrate (especially out of wedlock) and drunk-driving rate due to Okinawa’s culture of drinking liquor with high alcohol content.
  • You should be careful about “tatemae and honne” while in Japan. Tatemae and honne is the “idea that words and actual intentions are different."  While in Okinawa, I said MCAS Futenma “is not especially dangerous." My statements caused Okinawans to protest in front of my office. Although Okianwans claim MCAS Futenma is the most dangerous base in the world,they know it is not true. Fukuoka Airport and Osaka Itami Airport are just as dangerous (Fukuoka and Itami airports are NOT US military bases).
  • Japanese politicians do tatemae and honne all the time. Okinawan politicians will agree to a negotiation in Tokyo but return to Okinawa and claim they did not. The US Ambassador and other representatives to Japan are constantly criticized for speaking the truth because the Japanese culture is too focused on tatemae and honne.

  • The US Military and JSDF have different mentalities. The US Military trains to prepare for possible deployment, but the JSDF train without actually preparing for deployment. 
  • Local people oppose to night training by the US Military but it is necessary because modern warfare is often fought at night. Night training is essential to maintain deterrence capability.
  • I don’t think Article Nine of the Japanese Constitution should change. I doubt it will ever be changed. It would be bad for the United States if the Japanese Constitution was changed because Japan would not need the United States’ Military. (The US military bases are justified under Anpo, or the Japan-US Security Treaty, NOT Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution. The Japanese Constitution does NOT stipulate anything on US military presence in Japan.) If the Japanese Constitution was changed the United States would not be able to use Japanese land to advance US interests. The high host nation support the Japanese government currently pays is beneficial to the US.We’ve got a very good deal in Japan.
******* the end of notes of Maher's lecture on December 4, 2010 *******
Related news below.

The Japan Times
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20110307a2.html


Monday, March 7, 2011

U.S. diplomat accused of disparaging Okinawans
Islanders 'masters of manipulation and extortion' on Futenma issue

Kyodo News

A U.S. official in charge of Japanese affairs at the State Department is said to have likened the Japanese cultural principle of maintaining social harmony to "extortion" and described Okinawans as "lazy" during a speech in Washington late last year.

According to a written account compiled by students who attended the lecture at the State Department, Kevin Maher, head of the Japanese affairs office and a former consul general in Okinawa Prefecture, described Okinawan people as "masters of manipulation and extortion" when dealing with the central government.

"I am not in a position to comment on the record at this time," Maher said, noting his briefing was an off-the-record event. He said the account made available to Kyodo News is "neither accurate nor complete."

Maher has been involved in the bilateral negotiations on relocating the U.S. Marine Corps Air Station Futenma and is known to be an advocate of relocating it elsewhere in the prefecture, an idea detested by local residents.

The remarks attributed to Maher are making waves.

They are "racially discriminating against Okinawa," said Teruo Hiyane, a scholar on postwar Okinawan history. Ukeru Magosaki, a former diplomat, said Maher's reported view on Japan is "biased and completely distorted."

Maher gave the speech Dec. 3 at the request of American University to a group of 14 students who were about to embark on a roughly two-week study tour of Tokyo and Okinawa.

In the speech, Maher was quoted as saying, "Consensus building is important in Japanese culture. While the Japanese would call this 'consensus,' they mean 'extortion' and use this culture of consensus as a means of extortion.

"By pretending to seek consensus, people try to get as much money as possible," he said.

Maher also criticized the people of Okinawa as "too lazy to grow 'goya' (bitter gourd)," a traditional summer vegetable in the prefecture, according to the account.

On the base, which is situated in a crowded residential area of Ginowan, Maher allegedly said that while Okinawans claim the base is the most dangerous in the world, they know it's not true.

The civilian airports in Fukuoka and Osaka are "just as dangerous," he reportedly said.

Maher was quoted as saying that the Japanese government "needs to tell the Okinawan governor, 'If you want money, sign it," referring to the Futenma relocation plan.

Students who took notes during Maher's speech said he definitely made the remarks, and at least one said it was surprising to hear statements full of bias coming from a person in the U.S. government.

The air base affair in Okinawa has been dragging on for well over a decade.

Maher, 56, served as the consul general in Okinawa from 2006 to 2009 after joining the State Department in 1981 and being posted to Tokyo and Fukuoka.

Maher said of the account provided to Kyodo that he "cannot control how individual students themselves might interpret remarks" and "it would therefore not be appropriate" to attribute any specific remarks to him "based upon secondhand information coming from students or others."

In the summer of 2008, while he was posted in Okinawa, Maher sparked controversy after questioning why the local authorities were allowing the construction of homes in the residential area around the Futenma air base. Plaintiffs seeking damages over noise from the U.S. base then presented him with a written demand calling on him to immediately leave Okinawa.

Magosaki, former head of the international intelligence office at the Foreign Ministry, said he had the impression that "U.S. officials in charge of recent U.S.-Japan negotiations shared ideas like those of Mr. Maher," adding "in that sense, his remarks were not especially distorted."]

*******************************

Kyodo News, March 7, 2011

Okinawa governor dismayed by U.S. official's 'extortion' remark


NAHA —
http://www.japantoday.com/category/national/view/u-s-diplomat-said-to-have-likened-japanese-idea-of-harmony-to-extortion

Okinawa Gov Hirokazu Nakaima expressed dismay Monday at a remark made by a former U.S. consul general in Japan’s southwestern island prefecture describing people there as ‘‘masters of manipulation and extortion.’‘

‘‘His remarks make me question what the U.S. consular office in Okinawa exists for,’’ Nakaima told reporters. ‘‘I wonder what he learned in Okinawa when he was here.’‘

Former Consul General Kevin Maher, who is in charge of Japanese affairs at the U.S. State Department, talked about his experience of negotiating with Japan over the relocation of the U.S. Marine Corps’ Futenma Air Station to Nago, another location in the prefecture, which is stiffly opposed by Okinawa citizens.

Maher told Kyodo News, ‘‘I am not in a position to comment on the record at this time,’’ saying his briefing was an off-the-record event. He said the account made available to Kyodo News is ‘‘neither accurate nor complete.’‘

The remarks attributed to Maher are being seen as provocative in Japan. They are ‘‘racially discriminating against Okinawa,’’ said Teruo Hiyane, a scholar on postwar Okinawan history. Ukeru Magosaki, a former Japanese diplomat, said Maher’s reported view on Japan is ‘‘biased and completely distorted.’‘

Maher spoke on Dec 3 at the request of American University to a group of 14 students just before their roughly two-week study tour to Tokyo and Okinawa.

In the speech, Maher was quoted as saying, ‘‘Consensus building is important in Japanese culture. While the Japanese would call this ‘consensus,’ they mean ‘extortion’ and use this culture of consensus as a means of extortion.’‘

‘‘By pretending to seek consensus, people try to get as much money as possible,’’ he said.
Maher also criticized people in Okinawa as ‘‘too lazy to grow ‘goya’ (bitter gourd),’’ which is a traditional summer vegetable in the southern prefecture, according to the account.

On the Futenma base, located in a crowded residential area of Ginowan, Maher allegedly said while Okinawans claim the base is the most dangerous in the world, they know that is it not true.

Civilian airports in Fukuoka and Osaka are ‘‘just as dangerous,’’ he reportedly said.

Maher was quoted as saying that the Japanese government ‘‘needs to tell the Okinawan governor, ‘if you want money, sign it,’’ in reference to the Futenma relocation plan.

Students who produced notes of Maher’s speech said he definitely made the remarks, with at least one saying it was surprising to hear statements full of bias from a person with a position in the U.S. government.
Maher, 56, served as consul general, the top U.S. envoy, in Okinawa from 2006 and 2009 after joining the State Department in 1981 and being posted to Tokyo and Fukuoka.

Maher said of the account provided to Kyodo that he ‘‘cannot control how individual students themselves might interpret remarks’’ and ‘‘it would therefore not be appropriate’’ to attribute any specific remarks to him ‘‘based upon secondhand information coming from students or others.’‘

In the summer of 2008, while he was posted in Okinawa, Maher sparked controversy after questioning why the local authorities were allowing the construction of homes in the residential area around the Futenma base. Plaintiffs seeking damages over noise from the U.S. base presented him with a written demand calling on him to immediately leave Okinawa.

Magosaki, former head of the international intelligence office at the Foreign Ministry, said he had the impression that ‘‘U.S. officials in charge of recent U.S.-Japan negotiations shared ideas like those of Mr Maher,’’ adding ‘‘in that sense, his remarks were not especially distorted.’‘

Hiyane, professor emeritus of the University of the Ryukyus, said he ‘‘cannot overlook’’ remarks describing Okinawans as ‘‘lazy’’ and ‘‘masters of manipulation and extortion,’’ adding Maher’s remarks represent ‘‘a blatant mentality of occupation.’‘

‘‘The U.S. military has for over 60 years after the war occupied land best fit for agriculture in Okinawa,’’ he said. ‘‘Were it not for U.S. bases, the local economy including agriculture would have been different.’‘
‘‘By pretending to seek consensus, people try to get as much money as possible,’’ he was quoted as saying.

He also described people in Okinawa as ‘‘masters of manipulation and extortion’’ in their relations with the central government, according to the account.

In Tokyo, top government spokesman Yukio Edano told a news conference, ‘‘I do not think it is necessary to verify every remark (made by a U.S. official) based solely on news reports,’’ noting that their two countries regularly discuss and share mutual understanding on a wide range of bilateral issues.

Edano made his remark when asked if the government would make inquiries with the United States about the matter.

*****************************
Kyodo News, March 8, 2011
http://www.japantoday.com/category/politics/view/u-s-says-it-is-aware-of-okinawa-base-hosting-burdens-respects-local-people
U.S. says it is aware of Okinawa base-hosting burdens; respects local people

Tuesday 08th March, 08:42 AM JST

WASHINGTON —
The U.S. government is aware of the base-hosting burdens in Japan’s Okinawa Prefecture and respects the local people, a U.S. official said Monday, following recent reports that said a State Department official is said to have made remarks disparaging the people.

‘‘We recognize the burden that the people of Okinawa bear in terms of our bases. We deeply appreciate that,’’ a State Department official told reporters on condition of anonymity.

‘‘We have a great deal of respect for Okinawa and its people,’’ the official added.

His remarks came after Kevin Maher, who heads the Japanese affairs office at the State Department, is said to have made offensive remarks about Japanese culture and people in Okinawa in a lecture to students in Washington late last year.

The unnamed official declined to confirm or deny Maher’s remarks, saying only, ‘‘I’m not going to comment on things that may or may not be accurate.’‘

He also said Washington will continue to work with Tokyo on the relocation of a key U.S. Marine base in the southern island prefecture.

Maher likened the Japanese cultural preference for maintaining social harmony to ‘‘extortion’’ and described the people on the southern island of Okinawa as ‘‘lazy,’’ according to a written account compiled by some students who attended the lecture.

以下、共同通信による日本語報道。
2011年03月06日
和の文化「ゆすりの手段」 
 沖縄は「ごまかしの名人」
  メア米日本部長が発言 

 米国務省のメア日本部長(前駐沖縄総領事)が昨年末
、米大学生らに国務省内で行った講義で、日本人は合意
重視の和の文化を「ゆすりの手段に使う」 「沖縄はごま
かしの名人で怠惰」などと発言していたことが6日まで
に分かった。
 メア氏は米軍普天間飛行場(沖縄県宜野湾市)の移設
問題など日米交渉に実務者として深く関与、移設先を同
県名護市の辺野古崎地区とした現行案決着を米側で強く
主張してきた人物の一人。発言は差別的で、日本と沖縄
への基本認識が問われる内容だ。
 講義を聞いた複数の学生がメモを基に作成した「発言
録」(A4判3ページ)によると、メア氏は「日本の和
の文化とは常に合意を追い求める」と説明したうえで「
日本人は合意文化をゆすりの手段に使う。合意を追い求
めるふりをしながら、できるだけ多くの金を得ようとす
る」と述べた。
 沖縄については、日本政府に対する「ごまかしとゆす
りの名人」「怠惰でゴーヤーも栽培できない」などと発
言。普天間飛行場は「(住宅地に近い)福岡空港や伊丹
空港と同じ」で特別に危険でないとし、日本政府は仲井
真弘多(なかいま・ひろかず)・沖縄県知事に「お金が
欲しいならサインしろ」と言うべきだと述べている。
 メア氏は共同通信の取材に、講義は「オフレコ(公開
しないこと)で行った」とし、発言録は「正確でも完全
でもない」としている。
 講義は米首都ワシントンのアメリカン大の学生ら14
人に対し、彼らが東京と沖縄へ約2週間の研修旅行に出
発する直前の昨年12月3日、大学側の要請で行われた。
 講義録を作成した学生たちは「メア氏は間違いなくこ
のように言った」と証言。「米政府の地位ある人物の偏
見に満ちた言葉にとても驚いた」「人種差別的発言と感
じた」などと話している。(共同通信編集委員 石山永
一郎)

メア日本部長の発言要旨 

 米国務省のメア日本部長の発言要旨は次の通り。
 海兵隊8千人をグアムに移すが、軍事的プレゼンス(
存在)は維持し、地域の安全を保障、抑止力を提供する

 (米軍再編の)ロードマップのもとで日本は移転費を
払う。日本の民主党政権は実施を遅らせているが、私は
現行案が実施されると確信している。日本政府は沖縄の
知事に対して「もしお金が欲しいならサインしろ」と言
う必要がある。ほかに海兵隊を持っていく場所はない。
 日本の文化は合意に基づく和の文化だ。合意形成は日
本文化において重要だ。
 しかし、彼らは合意と言うが、ここで言う合意とはゆ
すりで、日本人は合意文化をゆすりの手段に使う。合意
を追い求めるふりをし、できるだけ多くの金を得ようと
する。沖縄の人は日本政府に対するごまかしとゆすりの
名人だ。
 沖縄の主産業は観光だ。農業もあり、ゴーヤー(ニガ
ウリ)も栽培しているが、他県の栽培量の方が多い。沖
縄の人は怠惰で栽培できないからだ。
 日本に行ったら本音と建前について気を付けるように
。言葉と本当の考えが違うということだ。私が沖縄にい
たとき、「普天間飛行場は特別に危険ではない」と言っ
たところ、沖縄の人は私のオフィスの前で抗議をした。
 沖縄の人はいつも普天間飛行場は世界で最も危険な基
地だと言うが、彼らは、それが本当でないと知っている
。(住宅地に近い)福岡空港や伊丹空港だって同じよう
に危険だ。
 日本の政治家はいつも本音と建前を使う。沖縄の政治
家は日本政府との交渉では合意しても沖縄に帰ると合意
していないと言う。日本文化はあまりにも本音と建前を
重視するので、駐日米国大使や担当者は真実を言うこと
によって批判され続けている。
 (共同)

発言録は正確でない 

 ケビン・メア米国務省日本部長の話 学生たちにはオ
フレコ(公にしないこと)で講義を行った。彼らが私の
発言をどのように解釈し、ノートにとったかまでは関知
し得ないが、学生からの2次的な情報をもとに、特定の
発言を私の発言とするのは不適切だ。発言録は正確でも
完全でもない。(共同)


ゆがんだ対日観を共有か

 孫崎享(まごさき・うける)・元外務省国際情報局長
の話 偏見であり、あまりにもゆがんだ日本観だ。日米
安保条約に基づく日米関係では日本は基地を提供、米国
は安全を保障するという対等かつ相互が利益を得る関係
のはず。日本は他国と比べても多額の「思いやり予算」
を払っており、「ゆすり」などとんでもない。普天間飛
行場の危険を軽視している点も日米が危険を認識したう
えで進めている移設計画の大前提を否定しているかのよ
うだ。
 ただ、メア氏のような考えを最近の日米交渉にたずさ
わる米側担当者が共有している雰囲気はあった。その意
味では発言が突出してゆがんでいるとは思えない面もあ
る。

看過できない差別発言 

 比屋根照夫(ひやね・てるお)・琉球大学名誉教授(
沖縄戦後史)の話 メア氏の発言は赤裸々な「占領意識
」そのものであり、沖縄に対する人種差別発言だ。米軍
は沖縄の最も農業に適した土地を戦後60年余りも占拠
し続けている。基地がなければ農業を含めた経済のあり
方も変わってくる。その現状を無視して、沖縄の人間を
「怠惰」「ごまかしとゆすりの名人」などという発言は
看過できない。米軍統治下でさえこれほどの侮蔑的な沖
縄観は表明されなかった。辺野古への基地移設案が動か
ない現状へのいら立ちが、図らずもメア氏の心底にある
沖縄蔑視を露呈させたのではないか。一方、それを記録
し、告発した米学生らの意識の高さに感銘を覚える。


ケビン・メア氏略歴 

 ケビン・メア氏 1954年生まれ。81年、米国務
省入省。在日米大使館安全保障部長、駐福岡米領事など
を経て2006年~09年まで駐沖縄米総領事。
 総領事時代の08年夏、普天間飛行場周辺に住宅地が
密集する状況について「なぜ市が建設を許しているのか
疑問がある」と発言、普天間爆音訴訟の原告らから「即
刻、沖縄から退島するよう」求める決議書を手渡された
。09年4月には総領事館近くのコーヒー店で男に突然
コーヒーをかけられる被害を受け、沖縄県警が男を逮捕
している。
 帰米後も国務省日本部長として日米の実務者協議など
の際にたびたび来日している。東大客員研究員の経験も
あり、日本語が堪能。

3 comments:

  1. メア発言ですが、多く出回っている訳「ごまかしとゆすりの名人」の「ごまかし」
    ですが、いまいち適切な和訳とはいえないと思います。

    Okinawans are masters of “manipulation” and “extortion” of Tokyo. が
    原文ですが、「ごまかし」と訳されている manipulation は、文字通りの訳では
    「操作」です。相手を操るとか、巧みに操作するとか、操作的と訳せるでしょう。

    今見たら、琉球新報では「沖縄の人々は日本政府を巧みに操り、ゆすりをかける
    名人である。」と訳しています。こちらの方がより適切な訳と思います。

    また最後の文は琉球新報では「私たち米国は日本に関して非常によい取引を得て
    いる。」と訳されています。これの原文はWe’ve got a very good deal in
    Japan.

    「米国は日本で非常にうまくやっている。」と訳されているところもありました。

    これは、ホストネーションサポートをたくさん払ってもらっているから日本の米
    軍駐留はとってもお得だと言っているのです。

    私だったら「我々(米国)は日本ですごく得をしている」と訳します。

    PeacePhilosopher

    ReplyDelete
  2. Linda Hoaglund8:38 pm

    thank you for your excellent work as always!
    Glad to hear it's getting so much coverage.
    I was introduced to Kevin Maher by Kina Shokichi,
    when I filmed Kina performing in his club in Naha.
    Kevin Maher was in the audience and Kina said,
    "Linda you should interview Kevin Maher for your film."
    I respectfully declined. After the show, Kevin Maher
    came up to me and said, "I hear you're making a film about Anpo."
    (A small article about me and my film had been in the local paper
    that day) Something about the way he said it to me, made me
    very nervous and as soon as I got home, I put all my original master
    tapes from the filming in a safe deposit box in the bank, just
    to be safe. It's hardly news, but the man certainly gave me the creeps
    and was obviously accustomed to intimidating people...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Linda Hoaglund8:41 pm

    Please also note that when some people in the audience
    got up to dance, he was dancing the hardest of all.
    how ironic...

    ReplyDelete