Peace Philosophy Centre, based in Vancouver, Canada (est. 2007), provides a space for dialogue and facilitates learning for creating a peaceful and sustainable world. ピース・フィロソフィー・センター(カナダ・バンクーバー 2007年設立)は平和で持続可能な世界を創るための対話と学びの場を提供します。피스필로소피센터(캐나다·밴쿠버 2007년 설립)는 평화롭고 지속 가능한 세계를 만들기 위한 대화와 배움의 장소를 제공합니다. 欢迎来到和平哲学中心!我们来自加拿大温哥华,我们致力于促进对话及建立可持续发展的和平世界。欢迎您留下宝贵的评论。Follow Twitter: @PeacePhilosophy / "Like" Facebook: Peace Philosophy Centre メールEmail: peacephilosophycentre@gmail.com
To view articles in English only, click HERE. 日本語投稿のみを表示するにはここをクリック。点击此处观看中文稿件。한국어 투고★Follow Twitter ツイッターは@PeacePhilosophy and Facebook★投稿内に断り書きがない限り、当サイトの記事の転載は許可が必要です。peacephilosophycentre@gmail.com にメールをください。Re-posting from this blog requires permission unless otherwise specified. Please email peacephilosophycentre@gmail.com to contact us.
Wednesday, September 23, 2020
We Need an Alternative Peace Museum in Hiroshima -- Questioning the Hiroshima-centred War Memory in Japan (10th INMP Conference Presentation) 第10回世界平和博物館会議発表「広島にはもう一つのミュージアムが必要」
We Need an Alternative Peace Museum in Hiroshima -- Questioning the Hiroshima-centred War Memory in Japan
Satoko Oka Norimatsu
Abstract:
Marking the 75th anniversary of the end of WWII this year, the author problematizes the general lack of recognition in the Japanese war memory for the history of the Empire of Japan’s seven decades of colonial rule and aggressive wars. This tendency is prevalent even in the “peace,” “anti-war,” and “anti-nuclear” communities, accentuated by what the author calls the “Hiroshima Historical View,” which centres itself around the Japanese suffering in the atomic-bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This view of history omits what led up to the atomic bombing and depicts the event as a sudden tragedy that befell the otherwise “peaceful” lives of Japan's innocent people. The newly renovated Hiroshima Peace Museum is no exception. It neither touches upon Japan’s invasions of neighbouring countries and Hiroshima's role in them, nor does it point to the United States’ responsibility for the evil that it committed. The author will discuss how such sanitization of historical responsibilities contributes to today’s acceptance of the U.S.-Japan military alliance that enables further buildup in the region, including Iwakuni and Kure, constituting a permanent “war capital” identity of Hiroshima. The author will conclude by presenting a vision for an alternative museum in Hiroshima.
On September 20, 2020, I organized a member-hosted special event with my colleagues Yuki Tanaka, a historian based in Melbourne, Australia and Akari Kojima and Yoshiki Kanai, members of a new social action group RADICAL BANANA.
No comments:
Post a Comment